Banyan Global Learning
AI GovernanceFor K–12 district leadership teams

Your district has an AI policy.
You don't yet have AI governance.

60% of your teachers are already using AI tools. 60% of them say your district has not communicated clear expectations. The policy-practice gap is widening — and the districts that close it now will be the ones that get this right.

Banyan's 5-Layer AI Governance Framework gives district leadership the structure, deliverables, and implementation support to move from reactive to deliberate — at a price point and practitioner depth no large consultancy can match.

The state of AI in K–12 — early 2026

60%
of U.S. teachers are using AI tools in their classrooms
60%
of those teachers say their district has NOT communicated clear AI policies
38%
CAGR: projected growth of AI in K–12 through 2033
28
states have published AI guidance — but most districts haven't kept up

What districts are asking for

One-day workshops don't solve a governance problem.

The AI-in-education market has moved. Districts aren't asking for another PD session — they're asking for institutional clarity: policy-to-practice alignment, assessment integrity standards, vendor evaluation frameworks, board-level readiness, and implementation roadmaps that survive longer than a semester.

These are higher-order problems that require a governance-first partner, not a PD provider. Banyan is built to be that partner.

Policy-to-practice alignment
You have policies. Classrooms are inconsistent. The gap between what the board approved and what happens in third period is real.
Assessment integrity
How do you handle AI and academic honesty when the tool is invisible and the policy is vague?
Vendor evaluation
Which AI tools should you approve, and what criteria should you use to decide — independently of vendor sales cycles?
Board-level readiness
How do you brief your board and community on AI risk in a way that is honest, confident, and actionable?

Banyan's proprietary framework

The 5-Layer AI Governance Framework

Most governance frameworks treat instruction as downstream from policy. This one treats it as the center of the entire system — which is how districts actually experience the problem.

L1
Strategic Clarity

Board-approved AI intent. Cross-functional steering. A vision your superintendent can articulate to staff, families, and media — and building principals can translate locally.

Sample assessment questions
  • Does your board have a documented AI strategic intent?
  • Can your superintendent and cabinet clearly articulate the district's AI posture?
  • Is AI strategy integrated into your district's broader strategic plan?
L2
Risk & Compliance

FERPA and COPPA alignment, vendor evaluation criteria, academic integrity boundaries, incident response. Protection from both legal exposure and reputational risk.

Sample assessment questions
  • Does your vendor evaluation process include AI-specific criteria (bias, transparency, data flow)?
  • Do you maintain a living inventory of all AI tools in use district-wide?
  • Have you defined AI academic integrity boundaries differentiated by grade level?
L3
Instructional Integration
Core differentiator

The center of the framework — and our core differentiator. Cognitive integrity: defining which cognitive work must remain human-performed for learning to occur. Assessment redesign. AI literacy as a discipline, not an afterthought.

Sample assessment questions
  • Have you articulated which cognitive work must remain human-performed in your instructional model?
  • Have your assessment practices been reviewed and updated to account for AI capabilities?
  • Does your PD go beyond tool training to include pedagogy, ethics, and cognitive impact?
L4
Operational Implementation

A documented 6–12 month implementation roadmap with milestones and owners. Sequenced, role-differentiated PD. Parent communication plans. The operational tissue that connects strategy to classrooms.

Sample assessment questions
  • Do you have a documented 6–12 month AI roadmap with milestones and named owners?
  • Is your PD sequenced over time and differentiated by role — or a one-and-done workshop?
  • Do you have a proactive parent and community engagement plan (not just reactive FAQs)?
L5
Infrastructure & Future-Readiness

Vendor independence, data sovereignty, infrastructure decisions driven by educational principles rather than vendor sales cycles. A 2–3 year evolution roadmap that accounts for AI's pace of change.

Sample assessment questions
  • Do you have a decision framework for cloud vs. local/private AI solutions?
  • Are infrastructure decisions driven by educational principles or vendor sales cycles?
  • Are you monitoring emerging developments — agentic AI, multimodal models, AI companions?
Free: 5-Layer AI Governance Self-Assessment Tool

A structured Excel-based diagnostic your leadership team can use to benchmark your current posture across all five layers. Built for superintendents, CTOs, and curriculum directors.

Request the tool

Engagement tiers

Choose your level of engagement

All engagements begin with a complimentary 90-minute AI Governance Readiness Workshop — a diagnostic session that uses the 5-Layer Framework to assess where your district stands.

Most common entry point

AI Governance Audit

$15K–$25K
4–6 weeks

A structured diagnostic across all five layers. We assess where your district stands, map the gaps, and deliver a prioritized action plan your leadership team can act on immediately.

Deliverables
  • 5-Layer Governance Assessment (full district)
  • Gap analysis report with prioritized recommendations
  • Vendor evaluation snapshot and compliance review
  • Board-ready executive summary
  • Implementation roadmap outline
Highest impact

AI Implementation Blueprint

$25K–$50K
3–4 months

Deep partnership from diagnosis through implementation. We build the governance infrastructure, redesign assessments, train leadership teams, and produce every major deliverable — then hand it over fully staffed and ready to run.

Deliverables
  • Everything in the Governance Audit
  • Cognitive Integrity Rubric (grade-differentiated)
  • AI Task Redesign Templates (curriculum-aligned)
  • Vendor Evaluation Matrix (Banyan-built)
  • Staff and parent communication toolkit
  • Sequenced, role-differentiated PD plan
  • 6–12 month operational roadmap with owners
  • 2–3 year infrastructure evolution roadmap
For sustained momentum

Strategic Advisory Retainer

$4K–$8K / month
Ongoing

AI governance is not a one-time engagement. The landscape shifts quarterly. Our advisory retainer keeps your leadership team current, accountable, and ahead of what's coming.

Deliverables
  • Monthly leadership check-in and strategy session
  • On-call policy review and vendor evaluation support
  • Emerging technology briefings (quarterly)
  • Board meeting prep and talking points
  • Incident response support as needed

All engagements are funded through general operating budgets, Title II-A, Title IV-A, or state AI/technology grants. Banyan can help identify applicable funding streams.

Competitive positioning

Strategic rigor. Classroom depth. Vendor independence.

Banyan occupies a positioning that no major competitor currently holds: governance-first, practitioner-grounded, and priced for the districts that need it most.

Our consultant has designed curriculum, led school programs, managed virtual learning systems, and built AI tools from the ground up. That cross-stack fluency — instruction, operations, technology, governance — is the core of what makes the 5-Layer Framework work.

Governance-first, not PD-first
Vendor-independent — we work for your district
Practitioner depth — classroom to boardroom
Complementary to CoSN, not competitive
Priced for mid-size districts ($15K–$50K)
Cognitive integrity as instructional north star
How we compare
AI for Education / ISTE
They train educators on AI tools
B
We architect the institutional systems those educators return to
CoSN Maturity Assessment
They tell districts where they are
B
We take districts where they need to go
McKinsey / Big 4
Strategic rigor, no classroom depth — and $200K+ price tags
B
Practitioner depth plus strategic rigor, at a price mid-size districts can fund
EdTech Vendors
Governance guidance that leads to product adoption
B
Vendor-independent — we work for your district, not a sales cycle
Case study
Kennewick School District, WA

100% of teachers agreed the PD was valuable and gained strategies they could apply immediately.

Kennewick School District engaged Banyan for district-wide AI professional development. After the engagement, every participating teacher reported gaining practical, applicable strategies — and increased openness to integrating AI into their instructional practice.

Read the full case study
100%
of teachers agreed the PD was valuable
100%
gained strategies they could apply to their teaching
100%
reported being more likely to use AI tools after the engagement

“These specific workflows have been helpful. Yeah, I am more open to using AI.”

— Kennewick teacher, post-engagement survey
Start here: complimentary 90-minute session

Schedule your AI Governance Readiness Workshop

A structured 90-minute session with your leadership team — superintendent, CTO, curriculum director — that uses the 5-Layer Framework to benchmark your current posture and identify your highest-priority gaps.

Complimentary. No obligation. No pitch until we know the fit is right.

Engagements may be funded through Title II-A, Title IV-A, state AI grants, or general operating budget.